Open-source DRM may sound like a contradiction, but someone is trying it.Traditionally, DRM has been a technology that restricts freedom, rather than granting it. This open-source DRM is probably more consumer friendly, since it is supposed to be less restrictive, however it is not clear that having an open-source computer helps the cause.

On one hand, open-source DRM is a step in the right direction. It provides a transparent and not exceedingly limited protection, which is better than a tight, proprietary form of DRM. On the other hand, though, no DRM would still be better than even light DRM, which still restricts what players you can use.

The real question is, does having open-source DRM encourage the use of this lighter DRM over more restrictive DRM? Ideally, those that would usually use more restrictive DRM would use this open-source DRM, while those that are considering dropping DRM altogether, would not be tempted by this DRM.

This entry was posted on Friday, October 24th, 2008 at 11:43 pm and is filed under Other. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.