Linux Loop
Advertisement


The Current State of the Economy and Linux

Recently, the Linux Foundation has apparently been pointing out that the struggling US economy may cause businesses that are looking to cut cost to switch to Linux. I completely agree, but there is potentially even more to it than just the struggling economy.

From the perspective of a business executive faced with having to cut cost somewhere, what would you cut? Almost anything that the customer sees directly is out from the start, so that leaves very little. One thing it does leave, though, is the IT budget.

Now, from an IT department’s perspective, think about what you would do with this reduced budget. Not only do you have to be careful not to spend too much on standard day-to-day costs, but there is a good chance that you were considering an upgrade soon. Why? Because the release of Vista may have had a lot of companies waiting to upgrade. Then, when Vista was not well received, many businesses probably just kept on waiting. Now, the IT department is faced with two options: forget about the upgrade and wait even longer or use Linux.

While neither the financial crisis nor the bad reception of Vista are in any way good, they do create an opportunity for Linux to take a step forward in business.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3 Responses to “The Current State of the Economy and Linux”

Note on comments: Trackbacks are disabled to prevent spam. Feel free to link to an article you wrote about this post, but only if it adds to what I have said and please tell readers why they should be interested. Comments will be held for moderation. Don't worry, it is just to keep spam off this site. If your comment does not appear in 24 hours, please use the contact link at the bottom of the page to let me know. Thanks!

Also, if all you want to say is something like "Linux sucks. Get real," please don't say it. It doesn't help anything. (Plus, you're wrong. :-))
  1. valmorel Says:

    I fear that IT managers might feel that an unknown system to them (Linux) might cost more in terms of support in the longer term. Unfounded, but heck, we have gone to war in the past over totally unfounded info. . . . .

  2. Roy Schestowitz Says:

    I remain pondering the issue of /migration/ *cost*.

  3. Mark Cahill Says:

    I’d love to believe that Linux doesn’t cost more in IT support costs than Windows, but it just isn’t true. It has nothing to do with the actual software, and everything to do with the giant mass of human capital that Microsoft has in having a mass-market product. There are way more M$ IT, so they become a dime a dozen. It’s all about supply and demand – if you only have 10 Linux support guys within 100 miles, then their cost is going to be significantly higher than the 10,000 M$ support guys.

Leave a Reply