Linux Loop
Advertisement


Bandwidth Caps Are Fine, But This Is Not, Comcast!

I am a Comcast subscriber. Where I live, I get great speeds. Streaming content from Hulu (standard def) works just fine, downloading a Linux ISO image is fairly quick, web surfing is great, and so on. I have not always been pleased with the service, though. There are long periods where I lose connection to the internet intermittently. Worse, about once a year Comcast’s service (at least in my area) goes down for several days at a time. In other words, my experience with Comcast has been mixed. Sometimes it is fast and great, sometimes it is completely unreliable. Comcast’s recent move, though, just takes it too far.

Comcast has just announced that they are going to be metering bandwidth and putting on a monthly cap of 250GB. Fine. I don’t have a problem with that. I would have a problem with a 15GB cap, but 250GB is OK. What I do have a problem with, though, is how they are informing customers if they exceed the cap. Comcast provides absolutely no way of knowing where you are, until you go over. That is crazy! They actually suggest that I should go search for a utility to install on each of my computers and then add them all up! OK. I have at least 6 computers in my house accessing the internet on a daily basis. So I now need to collect everyone’s computers once a week and check what the numbers say? Thanks a lot.

Just to add to all of this, the first time you go over, you just get a call. If you go over again in the next 6 months, they terminate your service for a year? What? How about slowing me down or charging me more? Just terminating my service is going to make me furious and lose them revenue. It makes no sense. Plus, they don’t even let you pay for more bandwidth.

So where do I go? That is the real problem here. Comcast has an absolute monopoly on decent speeds where I live. I can go to DSL from Embarq, which is slow, even for DSL, or I can go to dial-up. Believe me, if anyone else where here offering fast speeds, I would have switched long ago. I guess there is just nothing I can do. Hey Comcast, why don’t you just double our fees and only let us use 1GB of bandwidth. It’s not like you have any competition.

Sorry for the off topic rant. Back to the Linux news on Friday - unless Comcast takes my suggestion.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

2 Responses to “Bandwidth Caps Are Fine, But This Is Not, Comcast!”

Note on comments: Trackbacks are disabled to prevent spam. Feel free to link to an article you wrote about this post, but only if it adds to what I have said and please tell readers why they should be interested. Comments will be held for moderation. Don't worry, it is just to keep spam off this site. Thanks!

Also, if all you want to say is something like "Linux sucks. Get real," please don't say it. It doesn't help anything. (Plus, you're wrong. :-))
  1. Richard Chapman Says:

    I just checked my GKrellM logs and the most I’ve used in a month is 33GB. That represents both upload and download. I have Verizon DSL and although my speed is mediocre (Download: 2666 Kbps, Upload: 531 Kbps), I’ve never been dissatisfied with the service or the speed. So 15GB would be a hardship on me and if I had a choice I would change. We do have cable (Comcast) in our area but we don’t subscribe. We get all our entertainment from the Internet :-).

  2. Lamont L. Says:

    I can see where you would have a concern with their contact method when you surpass the bandwidth limit. I was curious where you are located. I would like to see what speeds we can offer in your area and if it is truly a network problem we need to repair.

    Lamont L.
    Embarq Customer Outreach
    embarq_lamont@embarq.com
    For additional support please visit http://www.embarq.com/rescueit or call 1-877-646-3282
    Voice | Data | Internet | Wireless | Entertainment

Leave a Reply