<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Touchscreen Desktop Instead of OLPC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxloop.com/news/2008/03/15/touchscreen-desktop-instead-of-olpc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/news/2008/03/15/touchscreen-desktop-instead-of-olpc/</link>
	<description>Keeping you in the loop with up-to-date Linux news.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 15 year seer</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/news/2008/03/15/touchscreen-desktop-instead-of-olpc/#comment-8828</link>
		<dc:creator>15 year seer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/2008/03/15/touchscreen-desktop-instead-of-olpc/#comment-8828</guid>
		<description>Perhaps learning to touch type is an even better solution.  It seems to work for 99.9999999999% of the users out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps learning to touch type is an even better solution.  It seems to work for 99.9999999999% of the users out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Cherlin</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/news/2008/03/15/touchscreen-desktop-instead-of-olpc/#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Cherlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/2008/03/15/touchscreen-desktop-instead-of-olpc/#comment-3120</guid>
		<description>The OLPC engineers have a touch screen on their list of possible features for future models, along with more memory and storage, and a faster processor. A touch screen would have to be far less expensive than this Brazilian one to make the cut.

A touch screen is not a better method of pointing than a mouse, but it supports gestures much better. A Wiimote is better still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OLPC engineers have a touch screen on their list of possible features for future models, along with more memory and storage, and a faster processor. A touch screen would have to be far less expensive than this Brazilian one to make the cut.</p>
<p>A touch screen is not a better method of pointing than a mouse, but it supports gestures much better. A Wiimote is better still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
