Every once and a while some patent scare comes up in the Linux world, often from Microsoft. They all generally go like this: big company says vague thing about their patent and Linux; everyone freaks out. These sorts of issues generally divide technical Linux users into two groups. One group says that nothing should be done until they see a lawsuit, and the other says we need to drop everything else and abandon the piece of software in question.

I am, of course, overstating the problem a little, but that is the general idea. The most recent incident was when TomTom got sued by Microsoft over their FAT filesystem implementation. This, of course, created a lot of conversation, much of which was completely unproductive. Now, though, a patch has been submitted that should eliminate the potential violation.

Regardless of the patent violation’s existence or lack of existence, a patch that fixes the issue completley is a really good step. If every time these issues came up, they were simply patched as time allowed, we could end all the theoretical arguements about what to do and just fix the problem.

Related posts:

1. What Do Microsoft Patent Deal Mean for Linux UMPCs? Nothing. A recent iTWire article suggests that when Xandros’s patent deal...
2. JVC The Latest to be Cought in the Microsoft Patent Deal Scam It appears that JVC is the latest company to sign...
3. Red Hat and Microsoft Join in Interoperability Deal Minus the Patents Over two years ago, Microsoft and Novell signed an interoperability...
4. OOXML and Office 2007: What Do Compatibility Issues Mean? With the semi-recent approval of OOXML by the ISO, an...
5. What's going on with Barracuda, Trend Micro, and ClamAV? It seems like everyone is talking about Barracuda, Trend Micro,...