Modify Colors

Default Reverse Brown Dark Blue

Archive

Advertisement

A recent Free Software Magazine article points out that using Linux protects you from potential governmental spying or hacking in two ways. First, Linux is open-source, so it would be extremely hard to inject a backdoor into its code. Second, since Linux is far less commonly used than, say, Windows, a governmental organization is far less likely to target it. All of this logic basically also applies to ordinary hackers, too. (And if you don’t think that governmental hacking will be an issue, it will almost undoubtably be an issue in some major country in the next few years.)

The open-source part is important, too. In most cases, the big deal is that you are using a product that have is out of the mainstream. Basically, if you run Windows, you have a thousand cannons firing you at all times. If, however, you run Linux or another less common operating system, you may only have a few or no cannons firing at you.

This is not to say that using the mainstream operating system is always a bad thing. In addition to having a thousand cannons firing at you, you also have the aid of everyone around you, rather than being an outlier fending for yourself. This is equivalent to Windows being the “standard,” and, thus, almost always supported.

While Linux being a less common operating system is often played as a disadvantage, it is really neither a disadvantage nor an advantage. It just depends. Do you want the support of the group with the cannons firing at you or do you want to be on your own, but with little chance of being hit?

Related posts:

  1. Turning Linux's Advantages in to Advantages No, I didn’t write that title wrong. Linux’s key advantages,...
  2. How Mainsteam is too Mainstream Every operating system is fighting to gain users and marketshare,...
  3. Why Do You Use Linux? At some point, nearly everyone who uses Linux has someone...
  4. Adobe Air: What it means for Linux Adobe Air is a technology that allows certain web applications...
  5. The Linux Foundation Should Stop Criticizing Solaris Recently, the executive director of the Linux Foundation, came out...

2 comments on this post.

  1. Wayne says:

    Godebian,

    You’re right – an OS either does have, or doesn’t have a solid internal design, and that is a huge difference. Windows doesn’t have a solid internal design, and never has (I’ve run every version of Windows from 3.0 to XP SP3, and quite frankly they are all crap).

    The only reason that Windows is able to maintain it’s market share, is that Microsoft negotiates with the computer OEMS to pre-install it, if they didn’t do that, Windows market share would have dropped dramatically before this. A good example is in the server market, where a lot of servers are sold with a Windows license, but a Linux/Solaris/BSD based operating system ends up being installed for use.

  2. Godebian says:

    Kudos, worst tech’s article ever.

    You’re missing the point: an OS do have or don’t a solid internal design.

    That’s the big difference.

Leave a Comment