<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artwork for Ubuntu Jaunty Already Impressive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/</link>
	<description>Linux news, Ubuntu news, open-source software reviews, and Ubuntu tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:32:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nealio</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>nealio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>These are the worst ever wallpapers I&#039;ve seen.  I hope this is a joke.  Why so literal???  Canonical really could use the help of some decent graphic designers out there.  Brown is a terrible colour choice.  Microsoft and Apple both know what they&#039;re doing because they have people who&#039;s job it is to get those OS&#039;s to look good.  It doesn&#039;t matter how &quot;good&quot; software is sometimes.  Lots of users get put off by how something looks unfortunately no matter how &quot;good&quot; it is.  Thankfully the wallpaper is something that is easily ditchable after a new install of Ubuntu!  A plain black background is better than this rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are the worst ever wallpapers I&#8217;ve seen.  I hope this is a joke.  Why so literal???  Canonical really could use the help of some decent graphic designers out there.  Brown is a terrible colour choice.  Microsoft and Apple both know what they&#8217;re doing because they have people who&#8217;s job it is to get those OS&#8217;s to look good.  It doesn&#8217;t matter how &#8220;good&#8221; software is sometimes.  Lots of users get put off by how something looks unfortunately no matter how &#8220;good&#8221; it is.  Thankfully the wallpaper is something that is easily ditchable after a new install of Ubuntu!  A plain black background is better than this rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>Annonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>Including the dust theme is a good start, Ubuntu should be aiming for the darker colors, more UPS like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Including the dust theme is a good start, Ubuntu should be aiming for the darker colors, more UPS like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pkt</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>pkt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>They *do* want to compete with MS. With apple I &#039;m not sure (although there is evidence for that too), but the fact that the &quot;foundational&quot; bug #1 in ubuntu&#039;s bugzilla (supposedly the most crucial bug that ubuntu was created to fix) was that MS has a larger market share. If that doesn&#039;t look like willingness to compete, I don&#039;t know what does :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They *do* want to compete with MS. With apple I &#8216;m not sure (although there is evidence for that too), but the fact that the &#8220;foundational&#8221; bug #1 in ubuntu&#8217;s bugzilla (supposedly the most crucial bug that ubuntu was created to fix) was that MS has a larger market share. If that doesn&#8217;t look like willingness to compete, I don&#8217;t know what does <img src='http://www.linuxloop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>...who says ubuntu wants to compete with OSX or Win? It&#039;s an alternative.. a smart and free (as in beer) alternative.

And then.. such hatred because of a wallpaper.. or a colour.. tststs... If you don&#039;t like it just download one of the hundreds of themes available.. or get creative and make your own.. or be &quot;open source minded&quot; and improve one that is already there.. maybe others will like it, too.
I use Windows (for my company), OSX (for private use) and Ubuntu (to actually get work done) - they all have their weaknesses and strengths. There is no &quot;perfect&quot; OS (although OSX is pretty close - if you have the cash to afford the hardware... ;) )



Andreas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;who says ubuntu wants to compete with OSX or Win? It&#8217;s an alternative.. a smart and free (as in beer) alternative.</p>
<p>And then.. such hatred because of a wallpaper.. or a colour.. tststs&#8230; If you don&#8217;t like it just download one of the hundreds of themes available.. or get creative and make your own.. or be &#8220;open source minded&#8221; and improve one that is already there.. maybe others will like it, too.<br />
I use Windows (for my company), OSX (for private use) and Ubuntu (to actually get work done) &#8211; they all have their weaknesses and strengths. There is no &#8220;perfect&#8221; OS (although OSX is pretty close &#8211; if you have the cash to afford the hardware&#8230; <img src='http://www.linuxloop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just amazed at how crazy the fighting gets. There is nothing inherently wrong with blue, or brown, or green - and browns have their place. I do agree that an overall improvement in the system as a whole - to make it look more like a professionally built product - is important. Windows 7 is looming as a big threat, and we can&#039;t assume that it will be as bad as Vista, and it should be better than XP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just amazed at how crazy the fighting gets. There is nothing inherently wrong with blue, or brown, or green &#8211; and browns have their place. I do agree that an overall improvement in the system as a whole &#8211; to make it look more like a professionally built product &#8211; is important. Windows 7 is looming as a big threat, and we can&#8217;t assume that it will be as bad as Vista, and it should be better than XP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micro</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>micro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>They do not look professional at all, but children will probably like them. If Ubuntu wants to compete with Mac or Windows 7 they need something that looks like a professional made it, not like it was created by some eager amateur programmer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do not look professional at all, but children will probably like them. If Ubuntu wants to compete with Mac or Windows 7 they need something that looks like a professional made it, not like it was created by some eager amateur programmer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding? Those wallpapers are garbage! Authors have no sense and taste to do a professional wallpaper. Those wallpapers can be used maybe for some kid-friendly OS, not for a professional OS Ubuntu wants to be. They should look at openSUSE how to do a professional artwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding? Those wallpapers are garbage! Authors have no sense and taste to do a professional wallpaper. Those wallpapers can be used maybe for some kid-friendly OS, not for a professional OS Ubuntu wants to be. They should look at openSUSE how to do a professional artwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sicko</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>sicko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu&#039;s theme is HORRIBLE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu&#8217;s theme is HORRIBLE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skripka</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Skripka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>Using KDE-I don&#039;t have anything vested in this...but I am a sucker for a good wallpaper....

We can argue salient details until the cows come home, regarding theme color choices, textures, etc etc etc.

But, at the most fundamental level, I really don&#039;t like how the subject is framed. In most of them.

Presumably-the subject is a jackalope. Yes?
-Most of these papers make VERY inefficient use of desktop space to present the subject of the image.
-Most have a big brown background with a tiny jackalope in the corner, seemingly as an afterthought.  I doubt it is, but to my eye (that tends to be critical)-that is the impression I get.

I like the Miffan R3 on the Wiki page the best of all of them-it needs work, they all do, but it has the most potential starting from a good idea.  It has the right idea.  The others don&#039;t, to be blunt.

-A good photo or image should leave no DOUBT as to what the viewer should be looking at and remembering, regardless of whether they know what a jackalope is or not.

-Also, and this is a BIG ISSUE, as a desktop wallpaper-I have a 22&quot; LCD panel 1680X1050 monitor--I don&#039;t want a wallpaper that is entirely brown, with a tiny 100X100 pixel jackalope in the corner. This exemplifies the big problem of poor image framing.  I want my wallpaper to show off my screen-all 22 inces of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using KDE-I don&#8217;t have anything vested in this&#8230;but I am a sucker for a good wallpaper&#8230;.</p>
<p>We can argue salient details until the cows come home, regarding theme color choices, textures, etc etc etc.</p>
<p>But, at the most fundamental level, I really don&#8217;t like how the subject is framed. In most of them.</p>
<p>Presumably-the subject is a jackalope. Yes?<br />
-Most of these papers make VERY inefficient use of desktop space to present the subject of the image.<br />
-Most have a big brown background with a tiny jackalope in the corner, seemingly as an afterthought.  I doubt it is, but to my eye (that tends to be critical)-that is the impression I get.</p>
<p>I like the Miffan R3 on the Wiki page the best of all of them-it needs work, they all do, but it has the most potential starting from a good idea.  It has the right idea.  The others don&#8217;t, to be blunt.</p>
<p>-A good photo or image should leave no DOUBT as to what the viewer should be looking at and remembering, regardless of whether they know what a jackalope is or not.</p>
<p>-Also, and this is a BIG ISSUE, as a desktop wallpaper-I have a 22&#8243; LCD panel 1680X1050 monitor&#8211;I don&#8217;t want a wallpaper that is entirely brown, with a tiny 100X100 pixel jackalope in the corner. This exemplifies the big problem of poor image framing.  I want my wallpaper to show off my screen-all 22 inces of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InTheLoop</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2009/01/07/artwork-for-ubuntu-jaunty-already-impressive/comment-page-/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>InTheLoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=1288#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>Oops. Fixed. No need to tell me twice. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. Fixed. No need to tell me twice. <img src='http://www.linuxloop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
