This morning I went to find the name of a piece of software through Add/Remove programs, only to find that there was only one category (“All”) and there were no applications listed at all. It took me less than 10 minutes to find and implement the solution, but I shouldn’t have to deal with this stuff. Worse, I find that these sorts of little problems are almost common. They don’t take long to fix, but they happen way too often. Not every day by any means, but still often enough to be annoying.

Ubuntu has all the features it needs for the moment. The best thing that could be done right now for Ubuntu would be to create a less-frequent highly stable, well supported release. Oh wait, that’s called a Long Term Support release. And it’s what I’m using right now.

What I am suggesting is really just a change to the way LTS releases are treated. There are four things I would like to see change about LTS releases:

1. Each LTS should focus almost exclusively on improving stability and fixing bugs. The point of regular releases should be to introduce new features. LTS’s on the other hand, should have their number one feature be less bugs.
2. All feature changes should have to be essential to the long-term usability of the release. In other words, the approval process for new features should be very strict. In fact, the only case in which a new feature would be approved would be if it were something like .docx compatibility that users are almost certainly going to need in the near future.
3. Make it easier to continue using the LTS release. Right now, by the time the next LTS release comes along, the old one feels really out dated. Sure there are the backports, but staying with an LTS release should be much easier. Ideally, there would be selected application updates and new features made available after some time for the LTS release. Not everything, but highly important applications, popular improvements that are easy to bring back, and new artwork. All of this should be on an individual opt-in basis, so you don’t get anything new (other than regular maintenance updates) unless you specifically ask for it.
4. Recommend new users download the LTS. Considering how the current system works, recommending the latest release to new users makes a lot of sense, but if the above changes were implemented, it would be a great idea to encourage everyone to use the LTS.

These chagnes would hopefully make Ubuntu much more stable without sacrificing the ability to rapidly add new features.

Related posts:

1. How Ubuntu Lost Its Credibility and the Road to Regaining It If Ubuntu announced that a radically new theme would be...
2. What LTS Should Mean This release of Ubuntu and the previous one have both...
3. Optional OSS Synchronization Recently the issue of synchronizing open-source software releases has come...
4. Ubuntu 9.04 Coming Soon to Dell Netbooks Dell has been somewhat slow in adopt new versions of...
5. No Release Will "Make or Break" Ubuntu A recent article that has gotten a lot of attention...