<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Linux Foundation Should Stop Criticizing Solaris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/09/27/the-linux-foundation-should-stop-criticizing-solaris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/09/27/the-linux-foundation-should-stop-criticizing-solaris/</link>
	<description>Linux news, Ubuntu news, open-source software reviews, and Ubuntu tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:32:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Terranova</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/09/27/the-linux-foundation-should-stop-criticizing-solaris/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Terranova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=724#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;One of open-source’s huge advantages is collaboration and sharing. If one project does something interesting, that can be picked up in other projects.&lt;/i&gt;

Usually, except when OpenSolaris picks a license that&#039;s completely incompatible with the GPL. The only interesting feature OpenSolaris has is ZFS; it will never be ported over to the Linux kernel, because Sun refuses to use a compatible license (if you could get ZFS on Linux, what&#039;s the point of OpenSolaris?).

Secondly, have you ever tried to code for OpenSolaris, or any other Sun Open Source product? Every experience I&#039;ve heard of involves the facade of openness and community, but neither actually existing. You can program for them if you want, but Sun 100% runs the show, which hurts their community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>One of open-source’s huge advantages is collaboration and sharing. If one project does something interesting, that can be picked up in other projects.</i></p>
<p>Usually, except when OpenSolaris picks a license that&#8217;s completely incompatible with the GPL. The only interesting feature OpenSolaris has is ZFS; it will never be ported over to the Linux kernel, because Sun refuses to use a compatible license (if you could get ZFS on Linux, what&#8217;s the point of OpenSolaris?).</p>
<p>Secondly, have you ever tried to code for OpenSolaris, or any other Sun Open Source product? Every experience I&#8217;ve heard of involves the facade of openness and community, but neither actually existing. You can program for them if you want, but Sun 100% runs the show, which hurts their community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Dobson</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/09/27/the-linux-foundation-should-stop-criticizing-solaris/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Dobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=724#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>Seems you have some fairly valid points to me.
Obviously not everyone is friends because they use similar licencing, but if it isn&#039;t seen as a threat (or perhaps it is!) then there is no need to directly criticise it.
Nexenta - nexenta.org is one good example of how how solaris has lots of mileage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems you have some fairly valid points to me.<br />
Obviously not everyone is friends because they use similar licencing, but if it isn&#8217;t seen as a threat (or perhaps it is!) then there is no need to directly criticise it.<br />
Nexenta &#8211; nexenta.org is one good example of how how solaris has lots of mileage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Zemlin</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/09/27/the-linux-foundation-should-stop-criticizing-solaris/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Zemlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=724#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>Fair point.  The article was unfortunate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point.  The article was unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
