<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Operating System&#039;s As Web Browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/21/operating-systems-as-web-browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/21/operating-systems-as-web-browsers/</link>
	<description>Linux news, Ubuntu news, open-source software reviews, and Ubuntu tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:32:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NT</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/21/operating-systems-as-web-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>NT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=382#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>&quot;First of all, operating systems can never become completely irrelevant unless computers become irrelevant, because you need an operating system to make a computer work.&quot;

Two words: net boot.  I can envision a scenario where, among the various diversifications of computers (desktop, laptop, netbook), one class becomes pure internet terminals.  They have no hard drives at all, and instead boot straight from the net.

Naturally, this would require a massive upgrade of the existing network infrastructure, including true gigabit ethernet piped directly into our homes.  Using the existing coaxial cable infrastructure has been a useful hack, but we&#039;re reaching the limits of that technology, since the &quot;last mile&quot; of the internet is becoming a crippling bottleneck.

But it could happen in principle.  It would be useful on two fronts: 1) computers (at least the internet terminal variety) would be cheaper, allowing more people to have internet access, 2) booting the same OS from a central server would allow you to work in the same environment on any computer without the need for back up / synchronization tools.

Of course, my preference would be Linux, but even proprietary operating systems could create a model where booting from a central server to multiple computers would be cheaper than installing copies of the operating system on each one.

Naturally there are security risks, but there are plenty of security risks already.  SSL encryption and key identification would be necessary.

Ultimately, users could choose the model that suits them.  So get ready for Ubuntu Netboot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;First of all, operating systems can never become completely irrelevant unless computers become irrelevant, because you need an operating system to make a computer work.&#8221;</p>
<p>Two words: net boot.  I can envision a scenario where, among the various diversifications of computers (desktop, laptop, netbook), one class becomes pure internet terminals.  They have no hard drives at all, and instead boot straight from the net.</p>
<p>Naturally, this would require a massive upgrade of the existing network infrastructure, including true gigabit ethernet piped directly into our homes.  Using the existing coaxial cable infrastructure has been a useful hack, but we&#8217;re reaching the limits of that technology, since the &#8220;last mile&#8221; of the internet is becoming a crippling bottleneck.</p>
<p>But it could happen in principle.  It would be useful on two fronts: 1) computers (at least the internet terminal variety) would be cheaper, allowing more people to have internet access, 2) booting the same OS from a central server would allow you to work in the same environment on any computer without the need for back up / synchronization tools.</p>
<p>Of course, my preference would be Linux, but even proprietary operating systems could create a model where booting from a central server to multiple computers would be cheaper than installing copies of the operating system on each one.</p>
<p>Naturally there are security risks, but there are plenty of security risks already.  SSL encryption and key identification would be necessary.</p>
<p>Ultimately, users could choose the model that suits them.  So get ready for Ubuntu Netboot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/21/operating-systems-as-web-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=382#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why, however, things like Monolight are quite useful :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why, however, things like Monolight are quite useful <img src='http://www.linuxloop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/21/operating-systems-as-web-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=382#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately you still see people using ActiveX for whatever odd reasons, do Firefox on Linux isn&#039;t supposed but Windows one is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately you still see people using ActiveX for whatever odd reasons, do Firefox on Linux isn&#8217;t supposed but Windows one is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/21/operating-systems-as-web-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=382#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>@linuxloop

To clarify something:

OS will never become irrelevant, they will only be irrelevant to &quot;average joe/mary&quot; who just wants to get on the Web and work on the cloud.

their are other aspects to an OS: a programming environment (could also be cloud based), a gaming platform (could also be cloud based: internet gaming), etc

well using web apps offline and something like adobe air are also great.

anyway, marketshare and mindshare will always be big factors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@linuxloop</p>
<p>To clarify something:</p>
<p>OS will never become irrelevant, they will only be irrelevant to &#8220;average joe/mary&#8221; who just wants to get on the Web and work on the cloud.</p>
<p>their are other aspects to an OS: a programming environment (could also be cloud based), a gaming platform (could also be cloud based: internet gaming), etc</p>
<p>well using web apps offline and something like adobe air are also great.</p>
<p>anyway, marketshare and mindshare will always be big factors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
