<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source in the Cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/16/open-source-in-the-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/16/open-source-in-the-cloud/</link>
	<description>Linux news, Ubuntu news, open-source software reviews, and Ubuntu tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:32:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Claughton</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/16/open-source-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator>David Claughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=365#comment-1201</guid>
		<description>Well, IANAL, but the CPAL section 3 is headed &quot;Distribution Obligations&quot; and although it talks about &quot;making available&quot; executables and source code, I suspect it would be easy for someone to make the case that this is only talking about distribution and not remote access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, IANAL, but the CPAL section 3 is headed &#8220;Distribution Obligations&#8221; and although it talks about &#8220;making available&#8221; executables and source code, I suspect it would be easy for someone to make the case that this is only talking about distribution and not remote access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/16/open-source-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=365#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, the AGPL addresses the issue of code availability for web-services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, the AGPL addresses the issue of code availability for web-services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InTheLoop</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/16/open-source-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>InTheLoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=365#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>David Claughton - That is really interested. I assume that you are talking mostly about the GPL in this case. I know Reddit choose the Common Public Attribution License (which they say is a modified version of the Mozilla license. Any idea if that has the same issue?

Source for Reddit license info:
http://blog.reddit.com/2008/06/reddit-goes-open-source.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Claughton &#8211; That is really interested. I assume that you are talking mostly about the GPL in this case. I know Reddit choose the Common Public Attribution License (which they say is a modified version of the Mozilla license. Any idea if that has the same issue?</p>
<p>Source for Reddit license info:<br />
<a href="http://blog.reddit.com/2008/06/reddit-goes-open-source.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.reddit.com/2008/06/reddit-goes-open-source.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Claughton</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/16/open-source-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>David Claughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=365#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>&gt; anything based on, for example, the Reddit code must be released back as open-source, assuming the original code was released under a GPL-like license that requires this

Yes, but there&#039;s a problem wrt web-based apps - you only need to make the source to your changes available if you distribute the application - but putting it on a web server and allowing remote access is not considered the same as distribution.

As cloud computing becomes more popular this is potentially going to become a hot issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; anything based on, for example, the Reddit code must be released back as open-source, assuming the original code was released under a GPL-like license that requires this</p>
<p>Yes, but there&#8217;s a problem wrt web-based apps &#8211; you only need to make the source to your changes available if you distribute the application &#8211; but putting it on a web server and allowing remote access is not considered the same as distribution.</p>
<p>As cloud computing becomes more popular this is potentially going to become a hot issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxloop.com/2008/07/16/open-source-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxloop.com/news/?p=365#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;Done correctly, it should be completely possible to encrypt the data before it leaves the client’s computer&quot;

Yes. The pattern is called Host-Proof Hosting (http://ajaxpatterns.org/Host-Proof_Hosting). It requires that all data is encrypted before leaving the browser. The encryption key should never be sent to the server.

Since the encryption happens in client-side Javascript, all the code is actually present in the browser and can be reviewed, and the calls to the server can be watched in the DOM in real-time. That said, the code review would need to be done every single time the application was loaded so as to make sure that nothing had changed in the meantime.

There&#039;s an ongoing discussion about this right now, and if/how we can overcome it.

For anyone looking to build their own HPH application, we&#039;ve just released a MIT/LGPL library here: http://code.google.com/p/passpack/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;Done correctly, it should be completely possible to encrypt the data before it leaves the client’s computer&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. The pattern is called Host-Proof Hosting (<a href="http://ajaxpatterns.org/Host-Proof_Hosting" rel="nofollow">http://ajaxpatterns.org/Host-Proof_Hosting</a>). It requires that all data is encrypted before leaving the browser. The encryption key should never be sent to the server.</p>
<p>Since the encryption happens in client-side Javascript, all the code is actually present in the browser and can be reviewed, and the calls to the server can be watched in the DOM in real-time. That said, the code review would need to be done every single time the application was loaded so as to make sure that nothing had changed in the meantime.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an ongoing discussion about this right now, and if/how we can overcome it.</p>
<p>For anyone looking to build their own HPH application, we&#8217;ve just released a MIT/LGPL library here: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/passpack/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/passpack/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
